The New Kid Defense: The Algorithm Made Me Do It

导读

网络已经取代电视成为现今父母的心头大患。儿童接触网络的年龄越来越低,沉迷时间越来越长,而算法推荐内容的儿童 app (如 YouTube Kids)推荐的内容质量不高,还不如电视节目来得让父母放心。现在的科技巨头,已经代替了华尔街,成为了让民众恐慌的一群人。我们的生活已经离不开微信,支付宝,谷歌,亚马逊。那么他们的这些算法,是不是应该更加智能一点呢?毕竟有点情商的机器,肯定更加可爱。

更多剧透

第一步:解决高频单词

algorithm /'ælgə'rɪðəm/

n. (尤指计算机程序中的)算法

defense /dɪ'fɛns/

n. 防卫,防护

blame /bleɪm/

v. 指责; 把…归咎于

sensitive /'sɛnsətɪv/

adj. 有感知力的; 能理解的

block /blɒk/

v. 阻挡;封锁

unlock /ʌn'lɒk/

v. 用钥匙打开;发掘 (潜力)

dwindle /'dwɪndl/

缩小; 减少

dirty /ˈdɝtɪ/

adj. 令人不快的,讨厌的

flawed /flɔd/

adj. 有缺陷的

interactive /,ɪntɚ'æktɪv/

adj. 互动的

60p

第二步:精读重点段落

(Tips: 双击文中单词可以查释义并加入你的生词本哦)

[2] Well, here’s another one that parents don’t like to cop to: Their kids watch a lot of digital content. According to research presented this year at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, 20% of the children in the study used a handheld device for an average of 28 minutes a day by their 18-month check-up, as reported by their parents. While my kids stayed away from screens until age 2, they’re now no exception.

  • cop to 承认,接受
  • handheld 手持式的; 掌上的
  • check-up 调查

[8] And there it is. The algorithm defense — essentially the modern-day equivalent of “my dog ate my homework.” Like most streaming services we’re all familiar with, YouTube Kids automatically advances from one video to the next, attempting to predict what my kids will like.

  • algorithm (尤指计算机程序中的)算法
  • defense 防卫,防护

[13] The “first, do no harm” mantra of the medical field must extend to an algorithm, which needs to be programmed or taught to recognize when something abnormal has occurred and alert an actual human accordingly. And wouldn’t it be amazing if, impending hurricane or not, Amazon’s listing pages refused to show any product that exceeds, say, 250% of the average price listed unless the user opted in to view it after a warning that the sellers are exceeding standard market rates?

  • mantra 准则
  • impending 即将发生的
  • exceed 超过(某数量)
  • opt 选择

[15] Kudos to them for realizing the need for more emotional intelligence, albeit only after the product has been in market for six years and others did research highlighting some of its gaps. The only challenge: The job listing dreams of an engineer who has experience in peer counseling and psychology. Unsurprisingly, the opening has been active since April. (This raises a broader question, which I won’t get into deeply here, about how our tech gets so complex that only highly technical people can build it and therefore haven’t most likely committed their lives to other things, like peer counseling and psychology.)

  • kudos 荣誉,认可
  • emotional intelligence 情商
  • albeit 虽然,即便
  • highlight  强调; 使注意
  • peer 同等地位的人

[17] Back to my daily morning woes: The unfortunate reality is that the YouTube Kids algorithm is beating me. My vigilance is flawed and easily misses when the app starts to stray into shaky territory. My daughters, sad to say, enjoy these toy videos. They pick them without even thinking about it until I say something. That means the algorithm is getting reinforcement to continue suggesting and auto-playing this bizarre content. And the parental controls aren’t detailed enough for me to block this.

  • woe 悲伤,苦恼
  • vigilance 警戒,警觉
  • flawed 有缺陷的
  • stray 走失,流浪
  • shaky 不牢靠的,可疑的
  • reinforcement 强化,加固

[18] The challenge of having these “smart” devices around is communicating how they really work to young kids. As savvy as my kids are, they still try to scroll our TV and laptop screens, because why wouldn’t they work that way too? So when it comes to explaining an algorithm in kid terms, I don’t know where to begin. Do I ask them to imagine a “character” in the machine? Perhaps suggest that there’s a cute but fallible gremlin in there trying to help them, but sometimes that gremlin wants them to watch stuff they shouldn’t.

  • savvy 聪明的,有经验的
  • scroll 在屏幕上滚动
  • fallible 易犯错误的
  • gremlin (传说能引起机械故障的)小妖精
85p

第三步:攻克必学语法

连字符的使用方法

连字符“ - ”英文叫做“hyphen”。除此之外,英文中还有“ —— ”破折号(dashes),和“ _ ”下划线(underscore)。

连字符的运用,主要是为了连接较为复杂的修饰语。

例:It’s recommended you don’t take down any load-bearing walls when renovating.(建议你在翻修的时候,不要把任何承重墙拆了)

如果在这里把连字符去掉,意思就会发生一定的改变(建议你在翻修的时候,不要卸下任何支撑墙的载荷)

这种复合的形容词中,如果是名词加形容词的组合时,通常需要加上连字符。而且当被形容的名词提前之后,可以直接省略连字符,来形容对方。比如:

This wall is load bearing.

当这种复合形容词是“副词”加“形容词”的形式时,也可以省略连字符。比如

错误的例子:Do you expect me to believe this clearly-impossible story?
正确的例子:Do you expect me to believe this clearly impossible story?

(想知道更多关于连字符的知识,可以到时候来听课呦~)

100p

加分任务:精读全文

在之前的三步后,你已经完全具备了精读全文的能力。再多花半个小时,让你的学习效果达到120%!

查看/展开全文


下载音频

(Tips: 双击文中单词可以查释义并加入你的生词本哦)

[1] No one tells you that becoming a parent means keeping a lot of dirty little secrets. Like that time you wiped your kid’s booger on the underside of a park bench when you were out of tissues. Or that sometimes (ok, at least once a month) an entire weekend goes by without them brushing their hair.

  • dirty 令人不快的,讨厌的
  • booger  鼻屎

[2] Well, here’s another one that parents don’t like to cop to: Their kids watch a lot of digital content. According to research presented this year at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, 20% of the children in the study used a handheld device for an average of 28 minutes a day by their 18-month check-up, as reported by their parents. While my kids stayed away from screens until age 2, they’re now no exception.

  • cop to 承认,接受
  • handheld 手持式的; 掌上的
  • check-up 调查

[3] It started when I downloaded a cute puzzle app for a road trip (here’s one of our faves), but it didn’t take many weeks before the kids were opening up the YouTube Kids app and wandering for themselves. By the time they turned 3, my kids had learned how to unlock our iPad and find the content they wanted without needing to ask.

  • fave 最爱
  • open up 打开
  • wander (目光)无目的地移动
  • unlock 用钥匙打开;发掘 (潜力)

[4] Now my twins are nearly 4 years old, and the iPad is a key part of our routine. They turn it on around 6:15 every morning.

  • routine 日常事务
  • turn on 打开

[5] Usually I hear a friendly chirp of tiny cartoon voices talking about how many sides a square has, or the power of teamwork when fighting crime while wearing pajamas. I tune it out until suddenly I realize I’m hearing a different kind of sound: crinkling cellophane as some faceless adult with a camera pointing at her own hands opens and plays with toys.

  • chirp 叽叽喳喳声
  • pajama 睡衣
  • tune out 不理睬,不注意
  • crinkle 起皱,使起皱
  • cellophane 玻璃纸
  • faceless 不露脸的,匿名的

[6] That’s right. Unboxing videos exist for toys. But these aren’t Christmas-morning home videos of children’s faces filled with wonder. These are manicured nails and a soft falsetto voice narrating the contents of a specialty Play-Doh set. Or pouring beads out of a water glass to discover a surprise toy figure buried inside. And this baby doll one that is too horrible to describe.

  • unbox 从箱子中取出
  • manicure 修剪,美甲
  • falsetto 假声

[7] All my noble dreams of raising my two daughters around wooden Montessori-approved toys and bright-red metal wagons has completely degraded. But watching someone else play with toys is where I draw the line. “Is that a toy video?” I call warningly from across the room. Both girls suddenly jump back from the screen. “iPad picked it!” they defend.

  • noble 高尚的,卓越的
  • approved
  • degrade 降级,退化
  • draw the line 划界线,区别

[8] And there it is. The algorithm defense — essentially the modern-day equivalent of “my dog ate my homework.” Like most streaming services we’re all familiar with, YouTube Kids automatically advances from one video to the next, attempting to predict what my kids will like.

  • algorithm (尤指计算机程序中的)算法
  • defense 防卫,防护

[9] Sadly, my children have watched enough of these toy videos without me noticing that the app often jumps there. So instead of blaming each other for the video selection, my kids blame a third thing I need to discipline: the machine.

  • blame 指责; 把…归咎于

When an algorithm needs a time-out

[10] My experience isn’t the only scenario in which an algorithm hasn’t done what a user would want.

  • scenario 事态,局面

[11] Amazon made news before Hurricane Irma when people started seeing enormously high-priced offers for water from third-party sellers. Normally, Amazon’s listings reward vendors offering competitive pricing, but apparently when supplies dwindled among these more fairly priced places, the obnoxious price-gouging items naturally jumped to the top of the list.

  • vendor 卖主,小贩
  • dwindle 缩小,减小
  • obnoxious 讨厌的,可憎的
  • price-gouging 哄抬物价

[12] In this case, while the Amazon algorithm might normally accomplish something good, it doesn’t actively block something bad, and that’s where I think we need to change our demands of the tech around us.

  • block 阻挡;封锁

[13] The “first, do no harm” mantra of the medical field must extend to an algorithm, which needs to be programmed or taught to recognize when something abnormal has occurred and alert an actual human accordingly. And wouldn’t it be amazing if, impending hurricane or not, Amazon’s listing pages refused to show any product that exceeds, say, 250% of the average price listed unless the user opted in to view it after a warning that the sellers are exceeding standard market rates?

  • mantra 准则
  • impending 即将发生的
  • exceed 超过(某数量)
  • opt 选择

[14] Another opportunity for “do no harm”: Apple is trying to make Siri, its voice-activated assistant, more sensitive by recruiting an engineer with a psychology background. Apple is hiring for the role Siri Software Engineer, Health and Wellness to address in a more human way serious conversations people have with Siri — topics ranging from cancer symptoms to existential musings.

  • sensitive 有感知力的; 能理解的
  • recruit 招收,招募

[15] Kudos to them for realizing the need for more emotional intelligence, albeit only after the product has been in market for six years and others did research highlighting some of its gaps. The only challenge: The job listing dreams of an engineer who has experience in peer counseling and psychology. Unsurprisingly, the opening has been active since April. (This raises a broader question, which I won’t get into deeply here, about how our tech gets so complex that only highly technical people can build it and therefore haven’t most likely committed their lives to other things, like peer counseling and psychology.)

  • kudos 荣誉,认可
  • emotional intelligence 情商
  • albeit 虽然,即便
  • highlight  强调; 使注意
  • peer 同等地位的人

[16] I certainly hope Apple is pursuing a plan B while they interview. In the interim, users should have a way to flag to Apple when a response isn’t sensitive enough. We need to crowdsource the humanity expected of these services to avoid harm.

  • in the interim 在过渡时期
  • flag 引起注意(某物)

Kids, it’s your fault, too

[17] Back to my daily morning woes: The unfortunate reality is that the YouTube Kids algorithm is beating me. My vigilance is flawed and easily misses when the app starts to stray into shaky territory. My daughters, sad to say, enjoy these toy videos. They pick them without even thinking about it until I say something. That means the algorithm is getting reinforcement to continue suggesting and auto-playing this bizarre content. And the parental controls aren’t detailed enough for me to block this.

  • woe 悲伤,苦恼
  • vigilance 警戒,警觉
  • flawed 有缺陷的
  • stray 走失,流浪
  • shaky 不牢靠的,可疑的
  • reinforcement 强化,加固

[18] The challenge of having these “smart” devices around is communicating how they really work to young kids. As savvy as my kids are, they still try to scroll our TV and laptop screens, because why wouldn’t they work that way too? So when it comes to explaining an algorithm in kid terms, I don’t know where to begin. Do I ask them to imagine a “character” in the machine? Perhaps suggest that there’s a cute but fallible gremlin in there trying to help them, but sometimes that gremlin wants them to watch stuff they shouldn’t.

  • savvy 聪明的,有经验的
  • scroll 在屏幕上滚动
  • fallible 易犯错误的
  • gremlin (传说能引起机械故障的)小妖精

[19] Or do I explain that the iPad won’t do anything they haven’t already told it they like. So it’s their fault when it auto-picks yet another toy video. I’m not sure I want my kids believing they control algorithms when too often in life, they won’t.

[20] For the time being, my solution has been to switch to an oldie but goodie: television. What it lacks in interactive content it makes up for by not being the content free-for-all that the Internet offers. It’s also a bigger screen, so I immediately catch when the content doesn’t meet my screen-watching standards.

  • oldie 旧事物
  • goodie 好东西
  • interactive 互动的,交互的
200p

algorithm /'ælgə'rɪðəm/

n. (尤指计算机程序中的)算法

defense /dɪ'fɛns/

n. 防卫,防护

blame /bleɪm/

v. 指责; 把…归咎于

sensitive /'sɛnsətɪv/

adj. 有感知力的; 能理解的

block /blɒk/

v. 阻挡;封锁

unlock /ʌn'lɒk/

v. 用钥匙打开;发掘 (潜力)

dwindle /'dwɪndl/

缩小; 减少

dirty /ˈdɝtɪ/

adj. 令人不快的,讨厌的

flawed /flɔd/

adj. 有缺陷的

interactive /,ɪntɚ'æktɪv/

adj. 互动的

不要一时兴起,就要天天在一起

明天见!


下载音频

The New Kid Defense: The Algorithm Made Me Do It

[1] No one tells you that becoming a parent means keeping a lot of dirty little secrets. Like that time you wiped your kid’s booger on the underside of a park bench when you were out of tissues. Or that sometimes (ok, at least once a month) an entire weekend goes by without them brushing their hair.

[2] Well, here’s another one that parents don’t like to cop to: Their kids watch a lot of digital content. According to research presented this year at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, 20% of the children in the study used a handheld device for an average of 28 minutes a day by their 18-month check-up, as reported by their parents. While my kids stayed away from screens until age 2, they’re now no exception.

[3] It started when I downloaded a cute puzzle app for a road trip (here’s one of our faves), but it didn’t take many weeks before the kids were opening up the YouTube Kids app and wandering for themselves. By the time they turned 3, my kids had learned how to unlock our iPad and find the content they wanted without needing to ask.

[4] Now my twins are nearly 4 years old, and the iPad is a key part of our routine. They turn it on around 6:15 every morning.

[5] Usually I hear a friendly chirp of tiny cartoon voices talking about how many sides a square has, or the power of teamwork when fighting crime while wearing pajamas. I tune it out until suddenly I realize I’m hearing a different kind of sound: crinkling cellophane as some faceless adult with a camera pointing at her own hands opens and plays with toys.

[6] That’s right. Unboxing videos exist for toys. But these aren’t Christmas-morning home videos of children’s faces filled with wonder. These are manicured nails and a soft falsetto voice narrating the contents of a specialty Play-Doh set. Or pouring beads out of a water glass to discover a surprise toy figure buried inside. And this baby doll one that is too horrible to describe.

[7] All my noble dreams of raising my two daughters around wooden Montessori-approved toys and bright-red metal wagons has completely degraded. But watching someone else play with toys is where I draw the line. “Is that a toy video?” I call warningly from across the room. Both girls suddenly jump back from the screen. “iPad picked it!” they defend.

[8] And there it is. The algorithm defense — essentially the modern-day equivalent of “my dog ate my homework.” Like most streaming services we’re all familiar with, YouTube Kids automatically advances from one video to the next, attempting to predict what my kids will like.

[9] Sadly, my children have watched enough of these toy videos without me noticing that the app often jumps there. So instead of blaming each other for the video selection, my kids blame a third thing I need to discipline: the machine.
When an algorithm needs a time-out

[10] My experience isn’t the only scenario in which an algorithm hasn’t done what a user would want.

[11] Amazon made news before Hurricane Irma when people started seeing enormously high-priced offers for water from third-party sellers. Normally, Amazon’s listings reward vendors offering competitive pricing, but apparently when supplies dwindled among these more fairly priced places, the obnoxious price-gouging items naturally jumped to the top of the list.

[12] In this case, while the Amazon algorithm might normally accomplish something good, it doesn’t actively block something bad, and that’s where I think we need to change our demands of the tech around us.

[13] The “first, do no harm” mantra of the medical field must extend to an algorithm, which needs to be programmed or taught to recognize when something abnormal has occurred and alert an actual human accordingly. And wouldn’t it be amazing if, impending hurricane or not, Amazon’s listing pages refused to show any product that exceeds, say, 250% of the average price listed unless the user opted in to view it after a warning that the sellers are exceeding standard market rates?

[14] Another opportunity for “do no harm”: Apple is trying to make Siri, its voice-activated assistant, more sensitive by recruiting an engineer with a psychology background. Apple is hiring for the role Siri Software Engineer, Health and Wellness to address in a more human way serious conversations people have with Siri — topics ranging from cancer symptoms to existential musings.

[15] Kudos to them for realizing the need for more emotional intelligence, albeit only after the product has been in market for six years and others did research highlighting some of its gaps. The only challenge: The job listing dreams of an engineer who has experience in peer counseling and psychology. Unsurprisingly, the opening has been active since April. (This raises a broader question, which I won’t get into deeply here, about how our tech gets so complex that only highly technical people can build it and therefore haven’t most likely committed their lives to other things, like peer counseling and psychology.)

[16] I certainly hope Apple is pursuing a plan B while they interview. In the interim, users should have a way to flag to Apple when a response isn’t sensitive enough. We need to crowdsource the humanity expected of these services to avoid harm.
Kids, it’s your fault, too

[17] Back to my daily morning woes: The unfortunate reality is that the YouTube Kids algorithm is beating me. My vigilance is flawed and easily misses when the app starts to stray into shaky territory. My daughters, sad to say, enjoy these toy videos. They pick them without even thinking about it until I say something. That means the algorithm is getting reinforcement to continue suggesting and auto-playing this bizarre content. And the parental controls aren’t detailed enough for me to block this.

[18] The challenge of having these “smart” devices around is communicating how they really work to young kids. As savvy as my kids are, they still try to scroll our TV and laptop screens, because why wouldn’t they work that way too? So when it comes to explaining an algorithm in kid terms, I don’t know where to begin. Do I ask them to imagine a “character” in the machine? Perhaps suggest that there’s a cute but fallible gremlin in there trying to help them, but sometimes that gremlin wants them to watch stuff they shouldn’t.

[19] Or do I explain that the iPad won’t do anything they haven’t already told it they like. So it’s their fault when it auto-picks yet another toy video. I’m not sure I want my kids believing they control algorithms when too often in life, they won’t.

[20] For the time being, my solution has been to switch to an oldie but goodie: television. What it lacks in interactive content it makes up for by not being the content free-for-all that the Internet offers. It’s also a bigger screen, so I immediately catch when the content doesn’t meet my screen-watching standards.

下载PDF版