- 注释版
- 纯净版
导读
随着知识资本越来越重要,特权也越来越具可继承性。
今天的富人们越来越多传给他们孩子的资产不再是几个晚上在赌场就能挥霍一空的钱财,而是更有用的,还不用交遗产税的真正的财富。它就是头脑。
知识资本驱使知识经济,因此那些掌握越多知识的人分得的饼也就越丰厚,其继承性越高。与上几代人相比,更多聪明成功的男人娶了聪明成功的女人。数据显示,这种“门当户对”造成的不平等性提高了25%。
解决方法当然不是劝富人不要为子女教育投资,而是应该更多帮助那些没有有钱爸妈的聪明孩子。从幼教开始,这个时期大脑的可塑性最强,正向刺激的作用力也是最大的。能够跟孩子说话,给孩子读书的父母当然是无可取代的,但良好的幼教机构是有所帮助的,尤其是对于那些为了家庭疲于奔命的夫妻来说。
不问出身的成功会使美国更富裕更有凝聚力,现在太多的人才被浪费了。
第一步:解决高频单词
privilege [ˈprɪvəlɪdʒ]
n.特权
heritable [ˈherɪtəbl]
adj.可继承的
fritter away
挥霍一空
invulnerable [ɪnˈvʌlnərəbl]
adj. 无懈可击的,不受伤害的
assortative mating
门当户对
conceive [kənˈsi:v]
v.怀孕,构想
relentlessly [rɪ'lentləslɪ]
adv.不懈地
pricey [ˈpraɪsi]
adj. 价格高的,昂贵的;
top-notch college
顶级大学
malleable [ˈmæliəbl]
adj.可塑的
第二步:精读重点段落
(Tips: 双击文中单词可以查释义并加入你的生词本哦)
As the importance of intellectual capital grows, privilege has become increasingly heritable.
- privilege[ˈprɪvəlɪdʒ] n.特权
- heritable[ˈherɪtəbl] adj.可继承的
第三段
Now they are beginning to find out, because today’s rich increasingly pass on to their children an asset that cannot be frittered away in a few nights at a casino. It is far more useful than wealth, and invulnerable to inheritance tax. It is brains.
- fritter away 挥霍一空
- invulnerable [ɪnˈvʌlnərəbl] adj. 无懈可击的,不受伤害的
第四段
Intellectual capital drives the knowledge economy, so those who have lots of it get a fat slice of the pie. And it is increasingly heritable. Far more than in previous generations, clever, successful men marry clever, successful women. Such “assortative mating” increases inequality by 25%, by one estimate, since two-degree households typically enjoy two large incomes. Power couples conceive bright children and bring them up in stable homes—only 9% of college-educated mothers who give birth each year are unmarried, compared with 61% of high-school dropouts. They stimulate them relentlessly: children of professionals hear 32m more words by the age of four than those parents on welfare. They move to pricey neighbourhoods with good schools, spend a packet on flute lessons and pull strings to get junior into a top-notch college.
- assortative mating 门当户对
- conceive[kənˈsi:v] v.怀孕,构想
- relentlessly [rɪ'lentləslɪ] adv.不懈地
- pricey [ˈpraɪsi] adj. 价格高的,昂贵的;
- top-notch college 顶级大学
第七段
The solution is not to discourage rich people from investing in their children, but to do a lot more to help clever kids who failed to pick posh parents. The moment to start is in early childhood, when the brain is most malleable and the right kind of stimulation has the largest effect. There is no substitute for parents who talk and read to their babies, but good nurseries can help, especially for the most struggling families; and America scores poorly by international standards. Improving early child care in the poorest American neighbourhoods yields returns of ten to one or more; few other government investments pay off so handsomely.
- malleable[ˈmæliəbl] adj.可塑的
第三步:攻克必学语法
今日主题:
to do作名词后置定语
例句:
The moment to start is in early childhood
开始的时机是幼年。
上面这句话中
to start是不定式作the moment的后置定语。The moment to start就是开始的时间点。
可是什么时候用不定式to do作名词后置定语呢?为什么不能用doing现在分词结构来修饰呢?它们的区别到底是什么呢?
比如我想说:解决这个问题的唯一办法就是不要理它。
我把这个句子写成这样:The only way solving the problem is leaving it alone. 对吗?
你是不是觉得读起来老顺了,可是这老错了,你知道不,为啥呢?
就是因为啊doing这个现在分词机构人家是非常有节操的,它要求啊它要修饰的名词必须可以主动发出doing这个动作,否则它就不干。
大家赶紧的,分析一下,这里way“方法”是解决问题solving the problem的主动发出者吗?霞姐说:同学们,请回家睡觉,我今天教的这个方法把英文学的老好了,我们都不用学习?这样逻辑肯定不对啊,正确的逻辑是人们通过某种方式方法来解决问题,解决问题的不是way自己。所以这里用doing修饰肯定错。
就是这种名词对于动作发出老重要了,没有就不行的那种重要,可是名词却不是动作直接发出者,那么咱们可以用to do修饰了。
这里正确的表达是The only way to solve the problem is to leave it alone.
注意is后面的leaving it alone表示way的内容也不对哦,也是不定式来。
比如这个文章中就出现了这么一句话:
The solution is not to discourage rich people from investing in their children.
Solution是什么,不是什么,后面用的是不定式to discourage哦。
当然以上说的是名词不是动作直接发出者,但动作发生很重要,用to do修饰。
还有一种情况名词是动作发出者,但是动作还没有发生表示将来。
就可以直接用
These are the books to be read. 这些是要读的书。
最后举一个doing作名词修饰语的例子哦:
The man standing at the gate is my father.
站在门口的男人是我老爸。
关于to do和doing作名词后置定语时候的区别你搞清楚了吗?
搞清楚了就要在平常生活中加以应用哦!
加分任务:精读全文
在之前的三步后,你已经完全具备了精读全文的能力。再多花半个小时,让你的学习效果达到120%!
下载音频
(Tips: 双击文中单词可以查释义并加入你的生词本哦)
American’s New Aristocracy
As the importance of intellectual capital grows, privilege has become increasingly heritable.
- privilege n.特权
- heritable adj.可继承的
第一段
When the candidates for the Republican presidential nomination line up on stage for their first debate in August, there may be three contenders whose fathers also ran for president. Whoever wins may face the wife of a former president next year. It is odd that a country founded on the principle of hostility to inherited status should be so tolerant of dynasties. Because America never had kings or lords, it sometimes seems less inclined to worry about signs that its elite is calcifying.
- nomination n.提名
- contender n.参选者
- hostility n.仇视
- dynasty n.家族政治, 朝代
- calcify vi.固化
第二段
Tomas Jefferson drew a distinction between a natural aristocracy of the virtuous and talented, which was a blessing to a nation, and an artificial aristocracy founded on wealth and birth, which would slowly strangle it. Jefferson himself was a hybrid of these tow types — a brilliant lawyer who inherited 11,000 acres and 135 slaves from his father-in-law — but the distinction proved durable. When the robber barons accumulated fortunes that made European princes envious, the combination of their own philanthropy, their children’s extravagance and federal trust-busting meant that Americans never discovered where the elite could reliably reproduce themselves.
- Aristocracy n.贵族
- Virtuous adj.高尚
- Artificial adj.人造的
- Strangle vt.扼杀
- robber barons 强盗式资本家
- philanthropy n.行善
- extravagance n.过度奢侈
第三段
Now they are beginning to find out, because today’s rich increasingly pass on to their children an asset that cannot be frittered away in a few nights at a casino. It is far more useful than wealth, and invulnerable to inheritance tax. It is brains.
- fritter away 挥霍一空
Matches made in New Haven
纽黑文的“门当户对”
第四段
Intellectual capital drives the knowledge economy, so those who have lots of it get a fat slice of the pie. And it is increasingly heritable. Far more than in previous generations, clever, successful men marry clever, successful women. Such “assortative mating” increases inequality by 25%, by one estimate, since two-degree households typically enjoy two large incomes. Power couples conceive bright children and bring them up in stable homes — only 9% of college-educated mothers who give birth each year are unmarried, compared with 61% of high-school dropouts. They stimulate them relentlessly: children of professionals hear 32m more words by the age of four than those parents on welfare. They move to pricey neighbourhoods with good schools, spend a packet on flute lessons and pull strings to get junior into a top-notch college.
- assortative mating 门当户对
- relentlessly adv.不懈地
- top-notch college 顶级大学
第五段
The universities that mould the American elite seek out talented recruits from all backgrounds, and clever poor children who make it to the Ivy League may have their fees waived entirely. But middle-class students have to rack up huge debts to attend college, especially if they want a post-graduate degree, which many desirable jobs now require. The link between parental income and a child’s academic success has grown stronger, as clever people become richer and splash out on their daughter’s Mandarin tutor, and education matters more than it used to, because the demand for brainpower has soared. A young college graduate earns 63% more than a high-school graduate if both work full-time — and the high-school graduate is much less likely to work at all. For those at the top of the pile, moving straight from the best universities into the best jobs, the potential rewards are greater than they have ever been.
- Mould vt.影响
- Mandarin n.中文
第六段
None of this is peculiar to America, but the trend is most visible there. This is partly because the gap between rich and poor is bigger than anywhere else in the rich world — a problem Barack Obama alluded to repeatedly in his state-of-the-union address on January 20th. It is also because its education system favours the well-off more than anywhere else in the rich world. Thanks to hyperlocal funding, America is one of only three advanced countries where the government spends more on schools in rich areas than in poor ones. Its university fees have risen 17 times as fast as median incomes since 1980s, partly to pay for pointless bureaucracy and flashy buildings. And many universities offer “legacy” preferences, favoring the children of alumni in admissions.
- peculiar adj.独有
- alluded vt.提及
- hyperlocal adj.绝大多数来自地方的
- legacy n. 赠与
Nurseries, not tumbrels
- Nurseries n.幼教
第七段
The solution is not to discourage rich people from investing in their children, but to do a lot more to help clever kids who failed to pick posh parents. The moment to start is in early childhood, when the brain is most malleable and the right kind of stimulation has the largest effect. There is no substitute for parents who talk and read to their babies, but good nurseries can help, especially for the most struggling families; and America scores poorly by international standards. Improving early child care in the poorest American neighbourhoods yields returns of ten to one or more; few other government investments pay off so handsomely.
- malleable adj.可塑的
第八段
Many schools are in the grip of one of the most anti-meritocratic forces in America: the teachers’ unions, which resist any hint that good teaching should be rewarded or bad teachers fired. To fix this, and the scandal of inequitable funding, the system should become both more and less local. Per-pupil funding should be set at the state level and tilted to favor the poor. Dollars should follow pupils, through a big expansion of voucher schemes or charter schools. In this way, good schools that attract more pupils will grow; bad ones will close or be taken over. Unions and their Democratic Party allies will howl, but experiments in cities such as battered New Orleans have shown that school choice works.
- anti-meritocratic adj.反精英的
- battered adj.落破的,破旧的
第九段
Finally, America’s universities need an injection of meritocracy. Only a handful, such as Caltech, admits applicants solely on academic merit. All should. And colleges should make more effort to offer value for money. With cheaper online courses gaining momentum, traditional institutions must cut costs or perish. The state can help by demanding more transparency from universities about the return that graduates earn on their degrees.
- meritocracy n.精英教育制度
- momentum n.势头
- transparency n.透明度
第十段
Loosening the link between birth and success would make America richer — far too much talent is currently wasted. It might also make the nation more cohesive. If Americans suspect that the game is rigged, they may be tempted to vote for demagogues of the right or left — especially if the grown-up alternative is another Clinton or yet another Bush.
- cohesive adj. 有凝聚力的
- demagogues n.煽动者
privilege [ˈprɪvəlɪdʒ]
n.特权
heritable [ˈherɪtəbl]
adj.可继承的
fritter away
挥霍一空
invulnerable [ɪnˈvʌlnərəbl]
adj. 无懈可击的,不受伤害的
assortative mating
门当户对
conceive [kənˈsi:v]
v.怀孕,构想
relentlessly [rɪ'lentləslɪ]
adv.不懈地
pricey [ˈpraɪsi]
adj. 价格高的,昂贵的;
top-notch college
顶级大学
malleable [ˈmæliəbl]
adj.可塑的
不要一时兴起,就要天天在一起
明天见!
下载音频
America’s new aristocracy
As the importance of intellectual capital grows, privilege has become increasingly heritable.
第一段
When the candidates for the Republican presidential nomination line up on stage for their first debate in August, there may be three contenders whose fathers also ran for president. Whoever wins may face the wife of a former president next year. It is odd that a country founded on the principle of hostility to inherited status should be so tolerant of dynasties. Because America never had kings or lords, it sometimes seems less inclined to worry about signs that its elite is calcifying.
第二段
Tomas Jefferson drew a distinction between a natural aristocracy of the virtuous and talented, which was a blessing to a nation, and an artificial aristocracy founded on wealth and birth, which would slowly strangle it. Jefferson himself was a hybrid of these tow types — a brilliant lawyer who inherited 11,000 acres and 135 slaves from his father-in-law — but the distinction proved durable. When the robber barons accumulated fortunes that made European princes envious, the combination of their own philanthropy, their children’s extravagance and federal trust-busting meant that Americans never discovered where the elite could reliably reproduce themselves.
第三段
Now they are beginning to find out, because today’s rich increasingly pass on to their children an asset that cannot be frittered away in a few nights at a casino. It is far more useful than wealth, and invulnerable to inheritance tax. It is brains.
Matches made in New Haven
第四段
Intellectual capital drives the knowledge economy, so those who have lots of it get a fat slice of the pie. And it is increasingly heritable. Far more than in previous generations, clever, successful men marry clever, successful women. Such “assortative mating” increases inequality by 25%, by one estimate, since two-degree households typically enjoy two large incomes. Power couples conceive bright children and bring them up in stable homes — only 9% of college-educated mothers who give birth each year are unmarried, compared with 61% of high-school dropouts. They stimulate them relentlessly: children of professionals hear 32m more words by the age of four than those parents on welfare. They move to pricey neighbourhoods with good schools, spend a packet on flute lessons and pull strings to get junior into a top-notch college.
第五段
The universities that mould the American elite seek out talented recruits from all backgrounds, and clever poor children who make it to the Ivy League may have their fees waived entirely. But middle-class students have to rack up huge debts to attend college, especially if they want a post-graduate degree, which many desirable jobs now require. The link between parental income and a child’s academic success has grown stronger, as clever people become richer and splash out on their daughter’s Mandarin tutor, and education matters more than it used to, because the demand for brainpower has soared. A young college graduate earns 63% more than a high-school graduate if both work full-time — and the high-school graduate is much less likely to work at all. For those at the top of the pile, moving straight from the best universities into the best jobs, the potential rewards are greater than they have ever been.
第六段
None of this is peculiar to America, but the trend is most visible there. This is partly because the gap between rich and poor is bigger than anywhere else in the rich world — a problem Barack Obama alluded to repeatedly in his state-of-the-union address on January 20th. It is also because its education system favours the well-off more than anywhere else in the rich world. Thanks to hyperlocal funding, America is one of only three advanced countries where the government spends more on schools in rich areas than in poor ones. Its university fees have risen 17 times as fast as median incomes since 1980s, partly to pay for pointless bureaucracy and flashy buildings. And many universities offer “legacy” preferences, favoring the children of alumni in admissions.
Nurseries, not tumbrels
第七段
The solution is not to discourage rich people from investing in their children, but to do a lot more to help clever kids who failed to pick posh parents. The moment to start is in early childhood, when the brain is most malleable and the right kind of stimulation has the largest effect. There is no substitute for parents who talk and read to their babies, but good nurseries can help, especially for the most struggling families; and America scores poorly by international standards. Improving early child care in the poorest American neighbourhoods yields returns of ten to one or more; few other government investments pay off so handsomely.
第八段
Many schools are in the grip of one of the most anti-meritocratic forces in America: the teachers’ unions, which resist any hint that good teaching should be rewarded or bad teachers fired. To fix this, and the scandal of inequitable funding, the system should become both more and less local. Per-pupil funding should be set at the state level and tilted to favor the poor. Dollars should follow pupils, through a big expansion of voucher schemes or charter schools. In this way, good schools that attract more pupils will grow; bad ones will close or be taken over. Unions and their Democratic Party allies will howl, but experiments in cities such as battered New Orleans have shown that school choice works.
第九段
Finally, America’s universities need an injection of meritocracy. Only a handful, such as Caltech, admits applicants solely on academic merit. All should. And colleges should make more effort to offer value for money. With cheaper online courses gaining momentum, traditional institutions must cut costs or perish. The state can help by demanding more transparency from universities about the return that graduates earn on their degrees.
第十段
Loosening the link between birth and success would make America richer — far too much talent is currently wasted. It might also make the nation more cohesive. If Americans suspect that the game is rigged, they may be tempted to vote for demagogues of the right or left — especially if the grown-up alternative is another Clinton or yet another Bush.